Philippa Crewe v The Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors

Neutral citation number: [2026] UKFTT 00664 (GRC)
Case Reference: FT-D-2025-1177
First-tier Tribunal
(General Regulatory Chamber)
Transport
Heard via Cloud Video Platform
Decision given on: 6 May 2026
Before
JUDGE PERI MORNINGTON
Between
Philippa crewe
Appellant
and
REGISTRAR FOR APPROVED DRIVING INSTRUCTORS
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: In person
For the Respondent: Did not appear
Decision: The appeal is allowed.
Mode of hearing: The Tribunal was satisfied that it was fair and just to conduct the hearing using Cloud Video Platform (CVP). The Respondent has indicated that it does not intend to appear at hearings of this nature for the foreseeable future.
REASONS
Introduction
This is an appeal against a decision of the Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors (‘the Registrar’) made on 24 October 2025 to refuse to grant the Appellant a third trainee licence.
Legal Framework
The grant of a trainee licence enables applicants to provide instruction for payment before they are qualified.
A trainee licence may be granted in the circumstances set out in s. 129 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (‘the Act’) and the Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) Regulations 2005.
A licence under section 129(1) of the Act is granted: ‘for the purpose of enabling a person to acquire practical experience in giving instruction in driving motor cars with a view to undergoing such part of the examination... as consists of a practical test of ability and fitness to instruct.’
In order to qualify as an Approved Driving Instructor, applicants must pass the Qualifying Examination. This comprises: the written examination (‘Part 1’); the driving ability and fitness test (‘Part 2’); and the instructional ability and fitness test (‘Part 3’).
Three attempts are permitted at each part. The whole examination must be completed within 2 years of passing Part 1, failing which the whole examination has to be retaken.
If a candidate has passed Part 2, they may be granted a trainee licence. The grant of a trainee licence enables applicants to provide instruction for payment before they are qualified. It is possible to qualify as an Approved Driving Instructor without having held a trainee licence.
When making its Decision, the Tribunal stands in the shoes of the Registrar and takes a fresh decision on the evidence available to it, giving appropriate weight to the Registrar’s decision as the person tasked by Parliament with making such decisions. The burden of proof in satisfying the Tribunal that the Registrar’s decision was wrong rests with the Appellant.
Factual Background to the Appeal
The Appellant passed Part 1 of the Qualifying Examination on 14 May 2024. She passed Part 2 on 10 July 2024. She failed a first attempt at the Part 3 on 19 March 2025 and failed a second attempt on 10 September 2025. The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (“DVSA”) cancelled a Part 3 test scheduled for 25 February 2026. There was a further Part 3 test booked and scheduled to take place on 15 April 2026 but the Appellant was forced to cancel this test due to fracturing her wrist on 20 March 2026 and requiring surgery on 1 April 2026.
The Appellant applied for a trainee licence which was granted and was valid from 23 September 2024 to 22 September 2025 following the application for a second licence.
The Appellant, applied for a third trainee licence on 28 August 2025 which was refused by the Registrar.
The reasons for the Registrar’s decision, in summary, were that the Appellant had already had a sufficient amount of time to gain experience to assist in passing Part 3 of the Qualifying Examination and that it was not the intention of Parliament that candidates should be issued with trainee licences for as long as it takes them to pass the examination, and that the trainee licence system must not be used as an alternative to registration as a fully qualified Approved Driving Instructor.
Appeal to the Tribunal
The original grounds of appeal were that the delays obtaining a Part 3 test date had significantly impacted the Appellant’s performance as the delays add pressure and stress in relation to the forthcoming expiry of a trainee licence. She considered that the delays meant that too much time passes between attempts at the test without being able to check one's progress.
The Registrar in his response states:
The purpose of the provisions governing the issue of licences is to afford applicants the opportunity of giving instruction to members of the public whilst endeavouring to achieve registration. The system of issuing licences is not and must not be allowed to become an alternative to the system of registration.
The licence granted to applicants is not to enable the instructor to teach for however long it takes to pass the examinations, but to allow up to six months experience of instruction. This provides a very reasonable period in which to reach the qualifying standard in the examination and in particular, to obtain any necessary practical experience in tuition. The Appellant has already had two trainee licences which cover a period of 12 months. Moreover, by virtue of the Appellant having applied for a third licence before the expiry date of the second, that licence has remained in force to the present time and will allow her to continue to give paid instruction until determination of the appeal.
Since passing her driving ability test the Appellant has failed the instructional ability test twice. Despite ample time and opportunity, the Appellant has not been able to reach the required standard for qualification as an Approved Driving Instructor.
The refusal of a third licence does not bar the Appellant from attempting the instructional ability test of the Register examinations. She does not need to hold a licence for that purpose, nor is it essential for her to give professional tuition under licence in order to obtain further training. The Appellant could attend a training course, or study and practice with an Approved Driving Instructor or give tuition on her own (provided that she does not receive payment of any kind for this). These alternatives are used by some trainees who acquire registration without obtaining any licences at all.
However, circumstances have now changed, and the grounds of appeal are that the Appellant has a fractured wrist and a medical certificate which signs her off work and means she is unable to provide tuition for at least 8 weeks from the date of her surgery on 1 April 2026.
Evidence
I read and took account of a bundle of documents and heard submissions from the Appellant in relation to her progress and her injury.
Discussion and Conclusions
The Appellant has failed two Part 3 tests. However, I note that the Appellant has now suffered an injury which significantly inhibits her ability to provide driving tuition to a standard which will adequately prepare her for passing her final attempt at the Part 3 test.
Whilst I accept that the trainee license is not a substitute for taking and passing the test, the unique circumstances of this case mean that I am satisfied that it is fair and in the interests of justice to allow the Appellant a further trainee licence for a period of 6 months from the date of this decision, expiring on 5 November 2026.
This should provide ample time and opportunity for the Appellant to recover from her injury and secure a date for her final attempt at the Part 3 test.
The Parties are reminded that pursuant to Regulation 3(4)(c) of the Motor Cars (Driving Instruction) Regulations an application to take the instructional ability and fitness test must be made within 2 years of passing the written examination, failing which the whole examination has to be retaken.
Accordingly, I allow this appeal and direct that the Appellant’s trainee licence is extended to 5 November 2026.